There is a woe of tragic means in lifes little narratives. Little do we know that accomplishing stories are not the ones swept up by an external savior. Is there really a happily ever after?
You’ve heard it called many things throughout time. Some call it, “Groupie”, “Fan Boi”, “Basic” or the latest satire reference; “Whorephanage'“, Black Dynamite (A Degen Collab) points out the flaw in the the DPE.

My personal favorite, “Disney Prince(ss) Effect” has ruined generations of children into small minded adults.
Aside from satires referencing real world implentations, we have been microdosed the reality to this dream. Gender roles have forced us to be one or the other for exploited happiness.
The key questions that cannot be measured through comparison:
What is happiness?
What is Success?
Cognitive workflow.
The current education system has taught us minimal comprehensive skills to function in todays economics. What we were taught is to be living in uncontested domocile relations for the remainder of our lives.
The make up of this coquille servitude is an empty enriched lifestyle, demanding more government additives for preservation.
Break out of the brittle shelled housing and take control of the narrative.
Be YOUR greatest accomplishment and be in control of YOUR own narratives.
The Science of Happiness, the scientific study of “what makes happy people happy,” was arguably launched by Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi in the late 1980’s.
The Global Emotions survey ranks South American countries at the top of the list. Conversely the World Happiness survey ranks Scandinavian countries highly. If you combine the results of both surveys in 2019, Canada and Iceland end up being the “happiest” countries, and not Finland or Denmark, which have grabbed the most headlines due to the popularity of the World Happiness Report. So much depends on the definition of happiness.
Oxford Happiness Inventory (Argyle and Hill)
Subjective Happiness Scale (Lyubomirsky & Lepper)
Satisfaction with Life Scale (Deiner, Emmons, Larsen and Griffin)
Ryff’s psychological wellbeing-scale. (Carol D. Ryff & Keyes)
Panas Scale (Watson, Clark, Tellegen)
And this is Todd Kashdan’s thoughtful critique of the above scales:
The assessment of subjective well-being (issues raised by the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire)